Friday, March 14, 2014

Cosmos and Islamic censorship

Like many other channels around the world, National Geographic Abu Dhabi (the Arabic version of Nat Geo) broadcast the first episode of the long awaited remake of Carl Sagan's Cosmos, after more than 30 years, hosted this time by the famous astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. And just as I expected, the channel was not honest while dubbing the first episode for its Arabic speaking viewers. They, quite clearly, intentionally removed or edited out certain parts that did not conform to the Islamic faith, or might have caused controversy in the Arabic speaking world. Their translation was also quite poorly made, and was fraught by minor, and some major, mistakes.



Here are the 7 major differences (that were most probably done intentionally) in Nat Geo Abu Dhabi's version, compared to the original one, in their order of appearance in the original episode:

1/ "Your god is too small" in Bruno's part - sentence removed.
2/ "At a time when there was no separation of Church and State" - voice distorted and inaudible (intentionally or just a technical glitch, can't be sure)
3/ "We are made of star stuff" - scene removed.
4/ "for more than 100 million years, the dinosaurs were lords of the Earth, while our ancestors, small mammals, scurried fearfully underfoot" - "our ancestors" was removed.
5/ "This is a good example of the extreme contingency, the chance nature of existence" - translated into some nonsensical mumbo-jumbo ("this is a good example of the danger of nature to survive", what does that mean?).
6/ "We humans only evolved within the last hour" - translated as "we humans only existed..".
7/ The birth of Moses, Buddha, Jesus, and Muhammad on the Cosmic Calendar - scene removed.

Quite surprisingly, they didn't remove the sections related to the origin of life, its evolution, and its spread from water to land. Apparently, Nat Geo Abu Dhabi has a problem with evolution only when it relates to our own species. The section which starts with the fossilized footprints, and goes on to speak of how we stood up and looked up at the stars, was also kept as it is, but then there was no explicit reference to our evolution in that scene.

I was of course focusing on stuff related to evolution, secularism, and such. But there were many other translation mistakes, most of which quite minor, but one big mistake I noticed was that they translated "centuries" as "decades". They actually did that three times! Once in reference to Jupiter's red spot, once in reference to how long we had this new cosmic perspective (intro to Bruno's part), and another when referring to how long we've been using the scientific method (right before Carl Sagan's part at the end). One other mistake is when they said the age of the universe was 14 billion years (13.8 billion years in the original version, and according to the latest studies).

There may be other changes I haven't noticed or simply forgot to mention. Overall, the channel's stance seems more progressive than most (religious) institutions in the Islamic world, if only for the fact that they kept scenes concerning the evolution of life, and scenes promoting the scientific method as our most powerful means to explore the universe. But for a channel supposed to represent science in the eyes of Arabic speakers, especially with the already poor scientific content in the Arab media, most of which is tainted by pseudoscience (scientific miracles in the Koran and such), it was quite dishonest to censor what little information the Arab viewer might get about our own history and evolution, as revealed by modern science. This is reminiscent of the, no less scandalous, news report by Aljazeera concerning the discovery of Ardi, a few years back, where they claimed that the discovery had "disproved" Darwin's theory of evolution!

Now, I'll just wait and see how they will deal with the second episode. A whole episode with the sole theme of natural selection! (See trailers here and here)

03.14.2014

By A.L.

Friday, February 10, 2012

Death for a Saudi journalist



As some of you may have heard already, there's a 23 year old Saudi journalist who's on the run after he made some tweets which many Muslims interpreted as insults of their prophet Muhammad. Most of them are demanding the death penalty, others say he should be prosecuted and whatever judgment the court makes would be accepted, and only a few people seem to be defending him. One of his colleagues wrote an article (which has been deleted, as I have just checked) where he defended Hamza Kashgari, saying that the man has apologized for whatever he wrote on twitter, and that supposing he made a mistake, he should be helped and guided, not killed.. a pretty gentle and diplomatic demand, which was met by scorn, anger, and some people in the comments section even responded that the writer of the article should be prosecuted himself..


Now seeing all of this you'd think that Hamza Kashgari must be some atheist who wrote outright insults of Muhammad, which would still not justify the reaction in light of our modern perception of human rights and freedom of expression, but would make it more understandable.. well, that's not the case: Hamza Kashrgari did not renounce his Islamic faith, and he even apologized.. also there's nothing particularly insulting in his tweets written on the Mawlid, the birthday of Muhammad (my translations below)..


From top to bottom:

- On your birthday I will say that I loved the rebel in you, who has always inspired me, but I didn't like the halo of sacredness, I won't pray for you..

- On your birthday I see you wherever I turn my face, I will say that I liked some things about you, other things I did not like.. and other ones I did not understand!

- On your birthday, I will not bow down to you, I will not kiss your hand, I will shake your hand like an equal, and smile to you as you smile to me, and speak to you like a friend.. no more..

I personally see more praise here than criticism, and certainly no insult in whatever form... even though I don't think Muhammad deserves any praise or respect.. he was a pedophile and a war criminal, though he made a great job in unifying the many divided and warmongering Arab tribes of the desert under one banner, and channeled their energy and hatred towards invading and plundering the nearby populations.. and I can back up my position with many accounts and passages from their very holy books... (here and here for example)


Last news, it seems that Hamza Kashgari was arrested in Malaysia and may be deported to Saudi Arabia.. there's a good chance he would face the death penalty..
Several sites, including this one, have reported that he has been arrested with the help of the Interpol. If this is true, it would be an infringement on Article 3 of the Interpol's Constitution, stating that the Interpol shall remain neutral on matters concerning international politics, religion, race, etc.

Neutrality is, and always has been, paramount to INTERPOL. As an international organization with a unique mandate, namely to prevent and fight crime through enhanced international police cooperation, it is of the utmost importance that INTERPOL’s activities transcend domestic and international politics.

Article 3 of INTERPOL’s  Constitution enshrines this guiding principle of neutrality by explicitly forbidding INTERPOL from engaging in matters of political, military, religious and racial character.

......

Deriving from those Resolutions and their implementation in INTERPOL’s practice throughout the years, the primary objectives of Article 3 may be defined as follows:

  • To ensure the independence and neutrality of INTERPOL as an international organisation;
  • To reflect international extradition law;
  • To protect individuals from persecution.


One of the most absurd things about Islamic law in Saudi Arabia, which I have come to know only recently, is that if you defame the name of Allah, you are given three days to repent, and if you do repent your life would be spared.. but if you defame the name of the prophet, you would face the death penalty even if you repent and ask for forgiveness.. is Muhammad somehow holier than Allah in Islam?